Has the Make in India program been successful in altering the constituents of the Indian economy?

Every economy comprises 3 constituents namely the agriculture, industry, and services sector. Make in India campaign was launched in 2014 with the target of boosting India's manufacturing sector that in turn would have altered the constituents of the Indian economy. However, as things stand today, there has not been a visible shift in trends for the constituents of the Indian economy. The trends for 3 constituents namely agriculture, industry & manufacturing, and services have remained the same even after the launch of the Make in India project.

In 2017, the Agriculture sector contributed 15.4% to India's GDP, the industry & manufacturing contributed 23% (approximately 16% comes from manufacturing and the remaining 7% from other industries), whereas the services contributed 61.5% to India's GDP.

While the percentage of the agriculture & allied sector has fallen gradually, and the percentage of the services sector has gone up gradually, however, the percentage of the industry & manufacturing sector has remained the same for the past many years in India.

In fact, from the period 2000-01 to 2013-14, the trend has been like this.

The contribution of the agriculture & allied sector to India's GDP has been gradually falling since 2000-01. The agriculture & allied sector contributed 22.36% to India's GDP in 2000-01. And by 2013-14, the contribution of the agriculture & allied sector had come down to 13.94% of India's GDP.

The contribution of the services sector to India's GDP has been gradually going up since 2000-01. The services sector contributed 50.49% to India's GDP in 2000-01. And by 2013-14, the contribution of the services sector had gone up to 59.93% of India's GDP.

The contribution of the industry including the manufacturing sector to India's GDP has been almost constant since 2000-01. The industry including the manufacturing sector contributed 27.25% to India's GDP in 2000-01. And by 2013-14, the contribution of the industry including the manufacturing sector was 26.13% of India's GDP.

The contribution of the manufacturing sector alone to India's GDP has also been almost constant since 2000-01 despite the launch of Make in India policy. The manufacturing sector alone contributed 15.46% to India's GDP in 2000-01. And by 2013-14, the contribution of the manufacturing sector alone was 14.94% of India's GDP.

These trends continue until now in the fiscal year 2019-20.

In comparison, in the case of China, In 2017, the Agriculture sector contributed 8.3% to China's GDP, the industry & manufacturing contributed 39.5% to China's GDP, whereas the services contributed 52.2% to China's GDP.

In the case of the advanced economies, the services sector contributes upward of 75% to the GDP. However, it should be noted here that all these advanced economies are high-income countries and therefore Indian economy can't be compared with these economies at this stage of India's development.

Even in the case of South Korea, in 2017, the Agriculture sector contributed 2.2% to South Korea's GDP, the industry & manufacturing contributed 39.3% to South Korea's GDP, whereas the services contributed 58.3% to South Korea's GDP.

Therefore, it is clear that for India to grow economically and generate millions of jobs, the contribution of the industry & manufacturing sector has to grow from the current 23% of the GDP to about 35% of the GDP. The contribution of the Manufacturing sector alone would have to grow from the current 16% of the GDP to 25% of the GDP.

However, it's been 6 years since the launch of the Make in India project and yet things have not improved. The industry & manufacturing sector continues to move linearly with the overall economic expansion.

The time has come to involve manufacturing entrepreneurs in the formal policy-making roles in order to draft comprehensive manufacturing policies for the country. Without a robust manufacturing policy and the supporting technical infrastructure, the industry & manufacturing sector can not grow fast. Bureaucrats and economists don't possess the subject knowledge and therefore asking them to draft manufacturing policies for the country is actually asking them a lot. Let's hope, manufacturing entrepreneurs are brought in policymaking roles to revive India's industry & manufacturing sector.

The Information Technology sector has been a success story in India, why can't the manufacturing sector be?

The services sector contributes nearly 61.5% to India’s GDP. The services sector has become the mainstay of the Indian economy. Despite the launch of the Make in India initiative in 2014, the manufacturing & industry sector contributes only 23% to India’s GDP. Whereas the agriculture sector contributes 15.4% to India’s GDP. As can be seen from the graph below, the share of the services sector is higher for the high-income countries barring China. In the case of China, the manufacturing & industry sector contributes nearly 40% to the Chinese GDP. However, India’s services sector has grown despite the lack of growth in the manufacturing & industry and agriculture sectors.

The IT/ITeS segments generate a bulk of the revenues for the overall services sector in India. As per the NASSCOM report, India’s information and technology sector recorded a growth of 7.7% with revenues of 191 billion US$ in the Fiscal year 2020. The sector also added 205000 new jobs in the fiscal year 2020. The sector has the potential to reach 350 billion US$ in revenues by 2025. By the year 2016, the sector had generated 3.7 million direct jobs and 10 million indirect jobs. The sector is poised to generate a total of 7 million direct jobs and 20 million indirect jobs by the year 2025. These are all impressive numbers.

Besides the IT/ITeS segment, healthcare and tourism add substantially to the overall services sector in India. And then, space, transportation, logistics, and other services form the core of the overall services sector in India.

• Why has the services sector grown and the manufacturing sector has lagged behind in India?

One reason could be entrepreneurship in India. The Indian entrepreneurs have built the entire services sector on their own with very minimal support from the state. In other words, the services sector required very minimal state support and therefore the sector has grown in India. However, wherever state support is necessary, those sectors have not done well in India. For example, manufacturing & industry definitely require state support and as can be seen from the above graph, the manufacturing & industry sector has not done well for a low-income country like India. Manufacturing contributes 16% to India's GDP out of the total of 23% contribution of the combined manufacturing & industry sector. The Indian policymakers have been looking to increase the share of the manufacturing sector from the current 16% to 25% to India’s GDP. And yet, the manufacturing sector has not grown. Make in India program was launched in 2014 with this sole objective, and yet, results are nowhere to be seen.

A low-income country like India can not move to the middle-income level unless and until the manufacturing & industry sector grows. India may not be able to replicate China’s numbers, however, it goes without saying that the manufacturing & industry sector needs to grow in India not only to boost India's economic growth but also to generate millions of jobs that India needs badly.

The Indian entrepreneurs have developed the services sector on their own. It’s time Indian entrepreneurs are encouraged to grow the manufacturing & industry sector as well. Since the manufacturing & industry sector requires state support in terms of developing the technical infrastructure in the country, therefore, Indian entrepreneurs shall not only be encouraged to grow the manufacturing & industry sector but also be encouraged to frame policies for the Make in India project. 

It is now certain that bureaucrats and economists can’t understand the technicalities of a hard subject such as manufacturing & industry. Therefore, it is beyond the scope of the bureaucrats and economists to frame policies for the manufacturing & industry sector. The need of the hour is to involve entrepreneurs in the policymaking roles when it comes to the Make in India initiative. Without involving entrepreneurs in the formal policymaking roles, it would be difficult to frame good policies and develop the necessary technical infrastructure for the manufacturing & industry sector.

The data pertaining to the services sector highlight that whenever the sector was left to its entrepreneurs, that sector grew tremendously. The IT/ITeS sector further strengthens this argument. The manufacturing & industry sector can become a growth sector for the Indian economy in the coming years provided entrepreneurs are making the policies for this sector. Will this happen?

Macro and Micro level solutions for India to achieve double-digit economic growth for the next 2 decades

Macro

The Indian economy has slowed down. And it has been slowing down for the last several quarters now.

India GDP Growth rate last 10 years:

Data Source: Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation

As can be seen from the above chart that the quarterly GDP growth rate is consistently falling since Jan - Mar 2018 quarter. In other words, the quarterly GDP growth rate numbers are falling for the last 7 quarters. This consistent fall in GDP growth rate for the last 7 quarters has raised the concern that problems in the Indian economy are structural and not cyclical.

• Therefore, what are these structural problems in the Indian Economy?

As we all know, the GDP comprises of 4 major components:
Economy E = Consumption (C) + Investment (I) + Government Spending (G) + Net Exports (X=Exports-Imports)
Here is the data for each of the 4 components of the Indian economy:

Exports as a percentage of GDP of India:

Imports as a percentage of GDP of India:

As can be seen from the above charts that the Consumption and Investment comprise roughly 90% of India's GDP. And Consumption is plateauing. Whereas Investment rates are falling consistently.

Therefore, at a macro level, the problems are identified. The problems are plateauing consumption and falling investment rates.

• Now, the question is, how can this trend of plateauing consumption, as well as falling investment rates, be reversed? 

One suggested solution is to give money in the hands of the people, especially rural people, in the form of PM Kisan, MNREGA, etc. The rural people with money in hand spend spontaneously thereby raising the consumption. However, is this solution really sustainable?

The other suggested solution is employment generation. This is a good idea as this will not only give a boost to consumption but also raise investment rates. Construction, infrastructure, manufacturing are 3 sectors that can certainly generate employment at a large scale.

• The construction sector though is going through a bad phase with many stuck and delayed projects. The union government has recently announced a stress fund to revive the construction sector. This is a step in the right direction. 
• The infrastructure sector is plagued with land acquisition issues. Within the infrastructure sector, roads, highways, railways have been given a special focus. The union government recently announced that 100 Lacs Crores worth of Infrastructure projects will be started in the next 5 years. However, both these sectors namely construction and infrastructure will take time to fructify. 
• The third sector that can generate employment at a large scale in India is the manufacturing sector. However, years after years, the manufacturing sector has not boomed in India.

Micro

The manufacturing sector has the potential to transform the Indian economy. Focus on the manufacturing sector and in particular on the Make in India initiative can set India on a path to achieve double-digit growth for the next 2 decades.

However, to boost the manufacturing sector in India, we need to differentiate between top-down manufacturing and bottom-up manufacturing.

Since 2014, the FDI inflows in India in absolute number terms have increased. However, FDI inflows as a percentage of GDP are below 2%. 

Moreover, FDI inflows go into various sectors of the economy. And even within the manufacturing sector, the FDI inflows go into the top-down manufacturing. 

In a top-down manufacturing approach, automation has resulted in a lack of employment generation. Robots and high-tech machinery are deployed to produce goods. 

Therefore, the bulk of the employment generation is only possible in bottom-up manufacturing. However, even the Make in  India program failed to focus on bottom-up manufacturing. And this is where our policymakers lack attention to details. Focus on bottom-up manufacturing will not only generate millions of jobs but also reduce India's trade deficit with China. Focus on bottom-up manufacturing will facilitate Indian entrepreneurs to manufacture simple common household goods in India rather than trading these goods from China. Simple common household goods such as toys, electrical items, electronic items, Diwali Lights, Plastic products can be easily manufactured in India. However, Indian entrepreneurs trade these goods from China. To support bottom-up manufacturing, the policymakers need to focus on developing manufacturing infrastructure in India. And this manufacturing infrastructure can be easily developed in a span of 2-3 years. All it needs is attention to detail. Now, the question that arises is 'How can this manufacturing infrastructure be developed'? Part of Government Spending (G) must be geared towards developing the manufacturing infrastructure. Once bottom-up manufacturing kicks-up in India, the private investment in the bottom-up manufacturing will rise regularly. However, the government needs to provide a trigger point.

Once this manufacturing infrastructure is in place, the Indian entrepreneurs will manufacture globally competitive common household goods in India. New manufacturing jobs will be created. This will not only boost India's own consumption but also give a boost to exports while reducing the imports from China.

Net-net, the Indian economy can boom by focusing on bottom-up manufacturing.